Rush
Limbaugh today attacked Oprah Winfrey.
Rush was mad at people who mention the obvious fact that the Office of
the President of the United States is being disrespected by people in red
states all around the country and by the head hancho conservative
commentators. Nobody can dispute this
if they were for example to engage in time travel to any other period in my
lifetime, or frankly, a considerable while BEFORE my lifetime. The next question is such disrespect
justified? Clearly it is not. The President was duly elected and is an
upstanding moral individual. The next
thing you need to ask is whether this prejudice and disrespect of the office of
President is racially motivated. Oprah
and I believe the answer is clearly “Yet”.
Clearly a white man would not get the amount of disrespect President
Obama has, since as I just indicated, we have never had this level of
vilification before. Now it’s reduced to doing spoofs like if
you’re a woman and you have a bad hair day?
“Thanks, Obama”. Got a run in
your stocking? “Thanks, Obama”. Then
Rush makes his counter attack. He says
“Well, if this is the case how come Oprah is so popular?” This in my mind is a complete non
sequetor. We were talking about the
President. But is Rush is at all serious
about how Oprah got to be as powerful and influencial as she is, the answer is,
“Hard work and perseverance”. I thought
these were qualities that Rush Limbaugh welcomed in Americans, but apparently
not if you’re black. I was watching that
“intervention” thing on the soap opera today.
What if Rush Limbaugh had such an intervention by the Lord God Almighty
and a bunch of his Holy Angels? Suppose
they all surrounded him in a room trapped with nowhere to go and said, “Rush- -
you are the most hateful man in America.
You seem to devote every waking moment to devising ways you can mess
people over. You even tell what the
media and congress to do. I heard you
barking orders to the Republicans about how they ought to not negotiate or
compromise on Obama care. We know that
your money has played a large role in your actions of hatred spewed every day
on the air. Like a teenager who gets a
driver’s license and abuses the privilege, we believe you have abused the
privilege you have enjoyed. You have
enjoyed unique medical care few Americans could ever afford, and expect them
all to have President Obama now because they themselves don’t have the medical
care you do. So in response and seeing a
clear problem we are going to take your millions away from you in a yet
unplanned financial mishap and see to it that you lose your job at EIB and are
like the common average Joe on the street out there, with whom till now you
have claimed to sympathize with.”
It’s after three and I just
went to Randi’s homework on her show today because she was reading from a book
called “Angry White Men”. Today’s date
is Monday November 18, 2013 but everything on the website is last Friday. Anyhow today’s themes of the show were
liberals made to apologise for offending conservative show hosts or
something. I missed something. But she spoke of people who would stand up
against a bully themselves being “hobbled” by all the commercial sponsors whom
the station cannot offend, because it might affect their oil and gas
sponsors. And then you have Monsanto who
is dispossessing a lot of small small farmers in the western plains, but of
course these red state politicians like in Texas and Oklahoma and such are
redirecting that anger of the people on to Latinos and Blacks. You would hope that the average person would
be smart enough to see through that. If it's really true as I've heard alledged that the media will NOT bring up certain issues or make needed apt remarks or ask key questions, then we really do not have real news Reporters today but media shills and whores. Here is one question nobody has the stones to ask. And that is of the right, "You say that in 1989 it was fine to have health care then the way the Heretage Foundation proposed. But now you say "But that was back in 1989". I have a question for you. What has changed with the medical profession in the past 25 years where the problems then are somehow not relevent now, and that America now no longer needs health care reform?
People
I’ve listened to on the radio today said that the Media in general takes its
cues from people like Bill O Riley and other head honchos of the right
wing. For instance the whole line about “This
health care roll-out is President Obama’s Katrina” is really pretty silly on
its face. What they perport to be saying
is that just as Katrina was the turning point in the Bush administration, so it
is with the roll out now. But as Chris
Matthews points out the comparison is nonsensical. You have people who have had their homes
swept away and are standing on the roofs of their dwellings with signs for
help. So you can’t compare this with the
failure of a web site unless you’re taken from your home and plopped in the
middle of a bunch of huddled masses in the Super Done. But really in both cases it was the democrats
crying “The American people need more help than they are getting’ and the
Republicans only screwing up the works.
Of course I should remind you that should such words such as “brotherhood
of man” or “equality” or “fairness” come up in conversation with these right
wingers, they will make a face like they just stepped in something. In fact I heard one preacher say (It may have
been the late Dr Walter Martin) that this idea of “The brotherhood of man”
doctrine is a dangerous hericy of liberation theology. I kid you not. Their impulse- - contrary to what Judy says-
- is NOT to show compassion to the poor and disadvantaged. As
for myself for decades I had no money issues with the Calvary Churches. Me and them got along just fine in this
area. They didn’t hound me for money and
I gave to them when I felt like it. This
is - - right up to the time when I actually was in need of money. Then it became an issue, in details I don’t
at this time care to relate. People
just love the low rates on their current medical insurance policies- - right up
to the day when they actually need it.
(Selah) There used to be one
fundamentalist pastor I defended to other family members - - but his attitude
tword me was something different entirely.
(again – no comment) You have not
only economic inequity - - but inequity in the justice system where if Blacks
were guilty of the same run-ins with the law that, shall we say a George
Zimmerman, the result would be entirely different. Yet is the President dares to say “The police
in this case acted - - Stupidly”, he has hell to pay from the ever nit-picky
right wing.
When it comes to this whole space travel business- - - were I crafty I could appeal to your ignorance and cite a lot of things Einstein said in his writings, and utterly convince you that - - the physical contours of space really ARE dramatically different depending on your location. But I know that what Einstein refers to is all the contingency of light speed, and that most of it is just "smoke and mirrors" to to speak, or a gigantic optical illusion. Therefore if I myself am going to venture into this whole "space is fluid" area- - I have to be very careful. We know one thing. We can "outrun ether", which means that in fact we can outrun gravity, or in other words to "out-run the thing that makes matter solid and substantive as we know it". I have said two things that are not contradictory. I said that the universe as we know it is Infinite. It goes on to infinity. But I have also stated, "God is the one who created Infinity". Infinity is an "artifact of God". (Selah) Since there are no stationary points in a "work space that goes on forever" then the concept of either speed, or a stationary point is meaningless. Who star galaxies may travel right through each other on a routine basis and neither need be the least aware of the other's existance. All that is by way of review. The truth we have is that - - the "event horizon boundaries" are different depending on your speed. It's like a radio station (to use one more analogy) where some people get it strongly, some get it weakly, and some don't receive it at all. You would not say "all three points have the same receiving capabilities" because obviously they don't. All three have different "fields". So there is not one "drawing canvas" but rather a multitude of them. Some may ask "Why have you abandoned the mirror theory - it was so tidy and symmetrical". I'll tell you why. It's a funny thing about mirrors. Even if the glass wasn't there you still couldn't step through to the other side- - because your image would mirror your every action. Taking from your side and giving to the other side therefore cannot be possible since mirroring by its definition if symmatry. Hence this device was useless to my purposes and I had to search elsewhere. Here's another thought for you and I warn you ahead of time not to draw the wrong conclusion. Suppose you were traveling to a distant star- - Arkturus or something- - and you noticed a "red shift". Now were you to accelerate a lot- - - let's say 3 G acceleration for five hours- - maybe you'd match the speed of the receeding star. But of course Einstein would say "Well actually you just subjected your body to five hours of a strong gravity field, and you slowed your time down to match the time-speed of the star ahead of you". That's the Alice in Wonderland explanation that completely skirts actual cause and effect. You need to watch for pitfalls like that. But here's a mind blower I'll leave you with. Is it possible to the same time view CURRENT events on earth and also CURRENT events on that Beatle Juice star, whatever 600 light-years away? Of course it is. No sweat. All you have to do is be right Between the two heavenly bodies- - three hundred years from now and you've got the thing licked. Cute, huh? But the looming question I haven't answered and the point of this paragraph is HOW TO YOU GET FROM ONE ETHER SYSTEM TO THE OTHER? I think psychic research has proved that it's possible. I have told you it involves "standing waves" that vibrate but don't travel. But you don't even need "Your Space" verses "My Space" to accomplish this in actuality. I've thought it over. Some of you will say to me "Why not just use the present Ether for your "Standing Waves"? That's always possible and is something worth thinking about.
No comments:
Post a Comment