The partisan polarity continues. Yesterday the economic stimulus bill passed in the House strictly along party lines. Not a single Republican house member voted for it. Clearly the Republicans are not heeding Obama's words to try and work together. This is dug in trench warfare, but thank God we are on the winning side. Eric Holder's name is working its way through the Congressional approval process and it looks like as of now that Obama will have the attorney general he wants. Once again people like Randi Rhodes and myself lament that a possible deal has been cut so that Holder will promise not to look into the misdeeds of the Bush Adminestration. As of now, Karl Rove is scheduled to testify before some congressional committee on February 2nd. about the Don Siegelman affair. This is a guy who was maliciously prosecuted by the Bush Adminestration for strictly political reasons. People would like to think that History has turned a page. But now we still have Rush Limbaugh to worry about. Rush Limbaugh is more political and polarizing now than he has ever been in the past, certainly more than he was at this equivelent period of the Clinton Adminestration where I and others still regarded him as an "entertainer". He was funny and cute to listen to. But now charges have been raised that Rush Limbaugh is a paid shill for various Corporations. Certain large corporations have engaged in a latter day "payola" scandal where they pay Rush Limbaugh money to affect his "independant analisis" of the world today and the role of corporations in it. I don't know what legal precident there is to bring Rush Limbaugh up on any charges, but people like Randi Rhodes and myself would sure like to know. What we have today is two entirely different world views of "The Way Things Ought to Be". Because in a world I envision, CEO's of big banks don't get bonuses from the money congress appropiated to help out the poor with their mortgage defaults. This to me seems flat out immoral under any yardstick. People will rage against the poor getting food stamps, but food stamps help out the economy and for every dollar of stimulus here- -it reaps dividends in the economy of a dollar seventy or something. So even if you're morally against the poor getting decent food, you should be glad that the economy is being helped. Rush gets paid a hundred million in salary, apparently, and essentially all Rush Limbaugh talks or thinks about is preserving his own pampered way of life with his women, his viagara and his Oxy Conten. I don't think he can continue to stay on the radio much longer once the non rich, who happened to have bought into Conservative right wing doctrine, figure out just what Rush Limbaugh's idea of Nirvana is. It's pointed out that conservatives of a previous era such as Barry Goldwater, would never gone for such a wholesale program of Walfare for the Rich. Thom Hartman says he once flirted with libertarian doctrine, untill he saw its moral pitfalls and economic impracticalities.
Some people such as Christians would look at the Poor who call for some sort of economic relief and their other misfortunes and just say "They only suffer on account of their sin. Because God has nothing to do with people suffering the natural consequences of their acts". First of all I defy you to say there is anything "natural" about our economic situation today. But also there is a new breed of Christian today who thinks that the sermon on the mount is an evil hericy. Back in mid 1981, Gene Scott began a rant against Cecil Rhodes and his "Sermon on the Mount" political views. This is the same Cecil Rhodes who is responsable for the Rhodes scollarships, which Bill Clinton got, and also I believe for "Rhodesia". John Kennedy in a speech once said, "If a society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich". Most people when you talk about "Religion", certain concepts come into their minds. They think of a whole supernatural realm- - a whole unseen "cosmos" out there and that sin and the consequences of sin are all tied up in these supernatural karmic forces. But Jesus of KFI as you know is virtually devoid of any belief in supernatural forces. So the idea to him of getting a "fresh start" with a "clean slate" because you got Baptized - is alien to him. If you tell him your personal problems, which these days are more than likely economic, he will shrug his shoulders and go "It's just the natural consequences of your act and God has nothing to do with that. But you or I would say, "Yeah but if God is God he sees everything. He sees the seen world and he also sees the unseen world. After all He created the visable and the invisable. And if sin could be "seen" then God sees that. God even sees the sin of those pastors and radio commentators who think they are perfect. Many people such as the Maharishi believe in the Teological view of creation. That is the idea that there Exists an Ideal state of the Universe. I have in the past used the image of the plackard held up at a football stadium where if you get enough of them showing, people are actually able to read the message, and as more people put their plackards up the message becomes clearer and clearer. And yet there are certain lines in scripture Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh and Ted Haggard and whoever take solice in. Because these passages say that we are to HATE the Cosmos. This is not only hatred of the physical matter of the world, but hatred of the whole Universe- - everything that God created- - even "The Heavenlies" themselves. People sometimes speak of getting "religion" as "becomming more spiritual". Not Jesus of KFI, but traditionally- - people look to this higher dimension of viewing the cosmos. But there is a scripture that also says we are to have emnity against the "powers of the air". This isn't refering to birds, but rather the "spirutual realms" - supernatural entities- - spirits, angels, ect. in general. Rush Limbaugh said once he was never going to use the phraise "The Planet" because Green people use this. People who love the planet are at emnity against "What's Right for America" according to some people. These people may speak of "consequences for actions" but they also look at certain groups like the poor, the blacks, those with AIDs, and see not people but "corrupt states of being" that one is to purge himself from contact with. If you are "the poor" you are not a person in need of compassion but you are "one of them" who is out to "corrupt your way of life". As such being Rich is seen as almost a Holy State of Virtue. In the eutopia of Rush Limbaugh the world is populated only by that one tenth of one percent- - the Ultra Rich. Nobody else matters- - not those people working sixty and seventy hour weeks to make ends meet, not small businessmen, not nobody. Only Themselves. (Selah)