We'll address the issue of that drone plane Iranians have found and now have an intelligence bonanza- - and the security implications, after I have studied up on it more.

Today President Obama gave a knock it out of the park speech on economics in Kansas before a very enthusiastic crowd. Randy Rhodes played it before one and is playing it after one now that I turned the soap opera off. The arrival of Doug and Julie was my cue to do that. Hopefully at some point a light bulb will go on in people’s minds as to the reality and contrast as to what conservatives verses what liberals are offering. The problem we have to contend with is that those on the right make Politics out of their Religion and a Religion out of their Politics. And they will hold to certain Beliefs with a certain religious pride and zeal with seemingly defies all logical persuasion. People like Judy who are not rich still cling to the notion (also held by poor southern White pre Civil War) that there is a THEM out there that is responsible for all their problems and threatening "their very way of life". The three most dreaded words for conservatives are “It doesn’t work”, which refers to the famed “trickle down economics”. It’s kind of a fact that if something doesn’t work, be it economic or even mechanical, it means you are not doing something Right- - no matter your personal “Belief” on the subject like people like Newt and Judy have. You know I goofed in “God’s Winepress”, the book I worte in 1980. In it I said that the European economy would never get together because there were too many diverse political and cultural differences of tradition and all. It looks like I was wrong because in both Greece and in Italy- - -the leaders of both nations were apparently fired at the insistence of the European Central Bank. According to Judy “The people of Greece are greedy” and I guess not to be afforded the right to vote on their own economic destiny. You know people have criticized “situation ethics”. They would say things like, “It doesn’t matter what “situation” the poor find themselves in because they have to play by the same rules as the rich and now try to steal their money”. According to Judy the rich are now so heavily taxed that soon they just won’t have any money left. I kid you not. That’s what people on the right believe. The truth of the matter is that being against “Situation Ethics” in any arena is downright Silly- - - because all we face in life is a “Situation” if you think about it. Others will say not to base their values or Faith on an “experience”. They say “Don’t go looking for an Experience”. Again- - all of life is an experience from the moment we are Born to the moment we die. That is unless you are a vegetable like Terry Shivo was, or those hospital patients at the beginning of the “Awakening” movie. I think what some are afraid of is not Experience but Enlightenment. I’ll tell you what Enlightenment is. It’s a light bulb going on in the brain. It’s a sudden Realization of a Truth that was finally reached by many diverse experiences, and perhaps recent ones, all leading to the same conclusion and pointing to the same Truth. For many I believe that Truth is that the Democrats are far more to be trusted with this economy than are the Republicans. Many say that- - for instance- - Christianity should not be Judged on whether “it works” or not. But here again the Truth in life is we all go through life based on things that “Work” and if it doesn’t work we chose to either fix or replace that thing. And it’s my believe that this November a lot of people will be “replacing” their political beliefs with another belief and switch from the Republican to Democratic parties.

Randy Rhodes has pointed out that corporations can’t be Persons because real people die and corporations live on forever. Corporations don’t have to go for pap smears or colonoscopies or E K G’s. Corporations are never given the Death penalty. For that matter corporations can’t be Aborted. Yes they were hatched but shouldn’t society decide for itself whether that life is worthwhile in society or else society will abort it, like they do with human fetuses? And what if a corporation merges with several other corporations. Can a corporation be accused of Polygamy? I asked Judy about this whole Citizen’s United court ruling and she convieniently knows nothing about it so can’t express an opinion. But the election of 2010 was decided because of this new influx or Corporate campaign funds and also because many on both the left and right were so shocked and stunned by recent economic developments they were overtaken by that they either didn’t vote at all or else left highly “suggestible” whereby they reasoned with their Emotions rather than their higher logic, much as an Evangelist is able to get people to stampede to the alter based on emotional manipulation. Engrams rule emotion and engrams are mental “error” or - - Sin. Hint: Don’t be ruled by error or Sin.

Certain things “are not politics; they’re just Math”. In answer to those questions on that quiz the first answer is Linear logic. Logic should never be circular, and any circular logic is deadly to a Program. Any break in circular logic would be a good thing - -especially in Religious discussions. Hence another question on the quiz is answered.

In terms of defining things- - the old umpire says “They Are what I Call them”. Many cultures even in this country have Defined the perameters of people’s lives. In this case defining things is not a Description of them but is instead setting the Perameters of all they will ever amount to in life. Hence these definers use the word “Shall” to talk about the future rather than using “Will” as a prognosticator would use. Many slurs are based on trying to “define” certain groups as being “They ARE what I Call them”. So you hear terms like shiftless niggers, and wetbacks. And perverted queers, and unwashed masses and rabble, or “environmentalist whackos”. Capish?

Some questions discuss Real numbers. Other words for this are “analog” and “irrational”. By the way the answer to another question is “the length of your dining room table” so mark that one off. But with Pascal the error that language makes is what they call Real numbers are in reality “floats”. You have single floats, double floats, and at times even triple floats. That’s why I told you to think of Ice Cream.

In two questions I am looking for the same word. In both cases I am talking about the propagation of waves of energy and the key word is “Medium”. Waves need a Medium of transmission. This is also true for the one about analog verses digital TV signals. Both methods have in common the same Medium of transmission- - Ether.

Four points will define a 3D space regardless of the number of dimentional coordinates it is drawn from. Four points from five or six dimensional space will still define a 3 D space. This is kind of a trippy concept if you think about it.

Hyperbola is the missing word in the ones about the sliced Cone. Hyperbola as a generic term means “over thrown”. Hence if Jesus uses hyperbola in the Sermon on the Mount, then at that point Jesus is sinning. This is the only logical conclusion.

AM radio can be understood if you have heard various instruments tuning up and hitting the same note and getting those beat pulsations. If they speed up the notes are father apart and when the notes come together the beats slow down and eventually stop. If you understand this concept you have grasped AM radio, which when you come down to it is a simple subtraction problem to figure out the frequency of the Intelligence.

Transferring to arc degrees in trig functions- - from number coordinate rations is like comparing rudabegas to cumquats. There is no formula you can use to do it, you just have to know it or look it up. Hence the only one of the four choices which fits this bill of invoking an actual Formula is the temperature conversion one from F to Kelvin.

The answer to the Sin question is - - Indulgence. The answer to the one about precedence of AND s and OR s - - is the Road Map Analogy - - not the Menu one.

The necessity for knowing an Independent variable from a Dependant one is in doing an Excel spreadsheet. In another question a decrease in the STEP command number IN-rreases the complexity of the drawing. A STEP increase causes a DE-crease in the complexity. As far as linear equations are concerned, other types of non-linear equations are Dot or point equations, of course - - and also Plane equations- - for those in Wolframalpha.com who think in 3 D terms. That’s what I meant by thinking “outside the box”. In the questions about demographics it’s Median - - Income. That’s the term I was looking for. If you were smart you already knew this term.

Let’s hit the two trigonometry questions. Hyperbolic trig focuses on the center of the arena like that famous “freeway interchange” diagram of all the variables of the functions they show. What is at the perimeter is not nearly so important as what is around the center focusing on the on ramps and off ramps and such. Regular trig is equally valid with any variable you choose to plug in, including ones several times the value of infinity. Regular or circular trig could also be called “optical trigonometry”. In that question about Sketch lines- - the answer is Sketch, unlike photography with their round lenses, is designed by be projected on a flat screen. Flat screen is the answer. Any straight line will always show up as straight if projected on a flat screen. Capish?

In terms of the last two questions the answer is you drive more intelligence from AM than from FM in terms of out of phase signals. For the tuner dial scale one the answer is numeric. Many dials do use a logarithmic or partially logarithmic dial but if they want to be accurate as far as band width, this remains numerically constant.

T H E – V I S C O S I T Y – O F – E T H E R

Captain Piccard once talked about a “Drag coefficient” in wind resistence. I’m not sure how much of that they have in outer space. Here is another stumper question. Which has a higher drag factor, a guy riding a bicycle or a racecar driver in a car? Some would say that the racecar would be more aerodynamically designed. However common experience tells you something else. It’s a fact that for any medium, as you accelerate the drag Factor goes up. Factor is the more conceise term rather than other terms such as Function. “Factor” always refers to multiplication and division in Algebra. Armed with this knowledge the example of objects falling from space makes more sense. We know that gravity operates at a rate of constant acceleration. Hence given a vacuum an object would continue to accelerate tword a gravity body as long as it was allowed to free-fall, that is, before it struck the object. But scientists tell us that a falling body will approach a certain speed and remain there, no matter how much further is has to fall. Hence it could be said that you are experiencing a 100% drag acceleration factor, meaning that one hundred percent of the additional gravity acceleration is taken up in atmospheric resistence. In my model of the past few years following the Lovitz – Moorley experiment done around 1900 - - - the notion of “ether wind” is raised. In my model this ether wind would in time come to be so great it would present a 100% drag factor at which point something would have to “give”. Somehow the FORCE of the ether would have to be “broken”. In this case – breaking the “light barrier” and once escaped from the Ether you would thence be in hyper-space. But I also raised the problem of material objects existing in a realm with no “space”. For any number of logical reasons, we know this can’t happen - - without some seemingly supernatural “transformation” of said traveling object. I cannot imagine how this would be done. Now I find it necessary to throw out my own theory based on the wind and viscosity problem, or utter lack thereof. What we need the ether FOR is not viscosity but Conductivity. We know that conductivity can pertain to a whole host of things. It can refer to sound, or light, or electricity, or heat, or just physical energy in general. How can one domino tipping over cause a whole long row of dominoes to tip over? It could be said that the dominoes are “conducted”. The force of the one domino is “conducted” to the rest. Electrolites in an appropriate liquid can even “conduct” molecules of a different metal on another for electro plating. So unlike my motorboat analogy- - there is neither viscosity nor a “wind”. What people forget about Einstein is that his “moving zero” example is Absolute, after a sort. That is each location in Space has an Equal standing in calling itself “zero”. To put this another way so that even Judy and Mitt Romney can understand it - - a budget that is 100% deficit would be at zero and a budget with a five percent deficit would be seen at say – 95% covered by tax revenues- - OK. But then President Obama comes along and says that “all deficits will be defined as equal. But don’t worry- for the states and nations deep in hock we are going to issue special BIG money to help them pay their bills, and we who are wealthy - - the 95 percenters, will use the little bills. The question is that for this model to work SOMEONE has to be using the big bills and SOMEONE has to be using the little bills, and one can point to another and say “your bills are bigger than mine but smaller than his”. With Einstein he states it is Impossible to do this. As such- - it would be Impossible to say that there IS an absolute speed limit of light. Capish? It’s like Dylan said in a song lyric, “Some of the people can be right all of the time and all of the people can be right some of the time, but All of the people can’t be right All the time”. (Selah) As such - - I say that Ether lacks the sort of measurable Viscosity found in almost any other substance. Hence there is never at any point where one’s absolute speed can be in any way measured by the Ether. Light speed seems to be influenced by both the Sending AND the Receiving object’s speeds in way we don’t yet understand. But how to do objects each mutually conspire to shrink Equally with reference to each other and realign themselves to shrunken measurements for one purpose and one purpose only and that is so light calibration speed can remain constant? Someone, tell me.