Just For The Record

There is a fifteen minute video that explains exactly how ISIS was formed and funded.  It's not a question of what the United States needs to DO - - Now or whenever, to combat ISIS.  It rather is what the US had done in the past and CONTINUES to do NOW that insures ISIS and groups like ISIS will continue.  This video exposes the LIE that somehow "Obama LOST Iraq", which Bush had won and Obama blew it.  Let's not overly complicate history here.  The Iraq war WAS won, so to speak.  But ISIS was not YET in existance.  It's like that Star Trek episode involving "Q" and Captain Piccard, where Piccard CAUSED this whole "Time" crisis to occur with the universe falling apart or whatever.  But the crisis HAD NOT occurred until the good Captain himself, with his own premeditated actions DID something to CAUSE the crisis, which he finds himself now combating as though it were a REAL crisis of external origin.  Let me translate that into present day terms.  There WAS no ISIS in 2011, or 2012 or even much of 2013.  So two years AFTER our last troops were OUT of Iraq, based on a decision made by President Bush in 2008, there WAS no "crisis" in Iraq.  John Mc Cain and others like him FUNDED this offshot of the "Free Syrian Army" and the "Free Syrian Army itself contributed to ISIS as did Israel and Turkey and of course Saudi Arabia and the other usual suspects.  John Mc Cain actually POSED in photographs with future ISIS members.  But ISIS was still nothing in mid 2013.  There was also all this military equipment we left in the desert just waiting for some outfit like ISIS to find and use them.  Even in the early part of 2014 ISIS was not that big a deal.  Of course President Obama is not the brightest bulb in the box.  So he made remarks like ISIS being like the junior varsity team.  It wasn't till June of 2014, just last year, that ISIS became a real threat.  And you know the rest.  Of course some left wing bloggers said that ISIS only tortures because our troops did it first.  But the lie gets repeated over and over by Limbaugh and Hannity that somehow our mission in the Iraq War was not yet accomplished and that we "cut and ran" even though the organization that is NOW a threat in the region did not even EXIST till two whole years after our last troops had left Iraq in 2011.  So I don't want our country being involved in fighting any thirty year war.  You know the history of all the Islamic groups that our government gave AID to only to have that aid turn against us.  There IS no need for some hocus pocus "Out of the Box" thinking.  No original thought need be involved.  Just STOP what we are doing now and GET OUT of the area and let the dust settle, which in time, it will, if we don't mess it up again.

I wanted to change subjects entirely and talk about this whole idea of "Formatted Space".  This is actually a Star Trek concept only in this episode the "space" had numeric coordenates based on Time rather than Space.  The question then was "Today's space" verses "Tomorrow's Space".   But no Time need be involved in my presentation of "Romulan Style cloaking devices", where I have gotten very specific in the past about it.  And I won't go into all the background now.  But some analogies actually "work" to foreshadow future events, such as the phrase "The faboric of space".   Just as threads making up a fabric are not a "solid mass" but have spaces in them so that water may pass through the cloth or whatever- - so once you catch the notion that there is some sort of physical Substance to space- - this opens up the whole idea of what this physicality is based on.  We've told you just like "the waves analogy" so you add like fractions in school with a common "denominator".  You can add for instance 2 X and 3 X to logically derive the answer of 5 X.  But still there is the unknown denominator, which is how we have viewed space since the Beginning.  We are all trapped in this "common denominator".   Some like Neil Savedra would say that overcoming gravity is an inherent physical possability to gain the sort of massive acceleration necessary for inter-stellar space travel.  But others have said that "gravity always pulls Down" as though "Down" were some kind of a God given absolute.  Scientists often know things the average citizen doesn't.  The Greeks by astronomic measurements and trigonometric deductions- - Knew the SIZE of the earth much more accurately than- - Columbus did, saying the radius was significantly greater than Columbus for his own reasons, believed that it was.   We know that three points DEFINE a plane, in the same way- - - the homosexual lobby says that two people in love and devoted to each other DEFINE a marriage, and this definition is fast becoming the law of the land.  But to use a digital analogy to represent space- - - four points have to CONFORM to something besides themselves.  They have to be co-pleanear to continue to define a plane.  All of the geometry and physics as we know it has to be in this "co-plainear" vein.  If something doesn't conform to the set algerithm, then it doesn't fit and the scientists can't use it- - and spacially it can have no physical representation in our universe as we know it.  Baryons, Leptons - and all the other building blocks of matter- - - have of course substance.  But it's substance alligned with a specific "fabric of space".   One could argue that dirt on a fabric for instance, technically is not a part of the fabric because it "isn't part of the weave".   The whole "loss of gravity" or more accurately "loss of mass" and the accompanying gravity field IN our formatted space- - would disappear, and with it all the newtonian acceleration problems, if we break out into a different algorithm for space.  An object that does not move significantly in its OWN space - - won't be dragged down by Neutonian acceleration problems moving in OUR space.  So it can move THROUGH "our space" but lose the gravity and mass.