Didn't anybody tell President Obama to read the fine print in any contract before he signs it?
We don't get a "do-over on Planet Earth" if we make a mistake on this one.
President Obama has one last chance to prove he actually has a soul. Not to quote the ex mayor of New York or anything but "I'd say it's about a 50 -50 proposition".
We don't get a "do-over on Planet Earth" if we make a mistake on this one.
President Obama has one last chance to prove he actually has a soul. Not to quote the ex mayor of New York or anything but "I'd say it's about a 50 -50 proposition".
The Canadian company TransCanada
hopes to begin building the northern section of an oil pipeline that would trek
close to 2,000 miles from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast of Texas. If
constructed, the pipeline, known as Keystone XL, will carry one of the world’s
dirtiest fuels: tar sands oil. Along its route from Alberta to Texas, this
pipeline could devastate ecosystems, pollute water sources and jeopardize
public health.
Giant oil corporations invested in
Canada's tar sands are counting on the Keystone XL pipeline to make the
expansion of oil extraction operations there profitable: The pipeline would
double imports of dirty tar sands oil into the United States and transport it
to refineries on the Gulf Coast and ports for international export.
Unfortunately, an area the size of
Florida is already set for extraction. Before TransCanada can begin
construction, however, the company needs a presidential permit from the Obama
administration because the pipeline crosses an international border.
An
environmental crime in progress
Dirty
tar sands oil
Pollution from tar sands oil greatly
eclipses that of conventional oil. During tar sands oil production alone,
levels of carbon dioxide emissions are three to four times higher than those of
conventional oil, due to more energy-intensive extraction and refining
processes. The Keystone XL pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels of dirty tar
sands oil into the United States daily, and result in climate-damaging
emissions equal to adding more than 5.6 million new cars to U.S. roads.
Water
waste and pollution
During the tar sands oil extraction
process, vast amounts of heat, water and chemicals are needed to separate the
tarry substance (known as bitumen) from sand, silt, and clay and to flow up the
pipeline. The water used in the process comes from rivers and underground
aquifers. It takes three barrels of water to
extract each single barrel of oil. Ninety-five percent of the water used to
extract the oil, which is about 2.4 million barrels per day, is so polluted
that the water must be stored in large human-made pools, known as tailing
ponds. As the heavy bitumen sinks to the bottom of these ponds, the toxic
sludge, full of harmful substances like cyanide and ammonia, works its way into
neighboring clean water supplies.
Forest
Destruction
The tar sands oil are underneath the
world’s largest intact ecosystem, the Boreal forests of Alberta. The forests
not only serve as an important carbon sink, but its biodiversity and unspoiled
bodies of water support large populations of many different species. They are a
buffer against climate change as well as food and water shortages. However, in
the process of digging up tar sands oil, the forests are destroyed. This
valuable forest and its endangered caribou are both threatened by the pipeline.
Indigenous
populations
Northern Alberta, the region where
tar sands oil is extracted, is home to many indigenous populations. Important
parts of their cultural traditions and livelihood are coming under attack
because of tar sands operations. Not only have indigenous communities been
forced off of their land, but also those living downstream from tailing ponds
have seen spikes in rates of rare cancers, renal failure, lupus, and
hyperthyroidism. In the lakeside village of Fort Chipewyan, for example, 100 of
the town’s 1,200 residents have died from cancer.
These problems will only get worse,
unless tar sands production is halted. Investing in a new pipeline would
increase the rate of production, while decreasing the quality of life for
indigenous populations.
Pipeline
spills
The Keystone XL pipeline would
traverse six U.S. states and cross major rivers, including the Missouri River,
Yellowstone, and Red Rivers, as well as key sources of drinking and
agricultural water, such as the Ogallala Aquifer which supplies water to more
than one fourth of America’s irrigated land and provides drinking water for two
million Americans.
The probability of spills from this
pipeline is high and more threatening than conventional spills, because tar
sands oil sinks rather than floats, making clean ups more difficult and costly.
TransCanada's first pipeline proves that this threat is real, as it spilled a
dozen times in less than a year of operation. Experts warn that the more acidic
and corrosive consistency of the type of tar sands oil being piped into the
U.S. as well as the risk of external corrosion from higher pipeline
temperatures makes spills more likely, and have joined the EPA in calling on
the State Department to conduct a thorough study of these risks.
In the summer of 2010, a million
gallons of tar sands oil poured into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan from a
pipeline run by another Canadian company, Enbridge. Although nearly one billion
dollars have been spent over the past three years to clean up the spill, almost
40 miles of the river are still contaminated.
In April 2013, a 22-foot crack in an
Exxon pipeline caused a devastating tar sands oil spill that began in a
residential neighborhood of Mayflower, Arkansas and into Lake Conway, a
drinking water source and popular fishing spot. Residents of the community were
unaware of the pipeline under their town until this massive spill.
Refining
tar sands oil
After traveling through the Keystone
XL pipeline, tar sands oil would be brought to facilities in Texas to be
further refined. Refining tar sands oil is dirtier than refining conventional
oil, and results in higher emissions of toxic sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide.
These emissions cause smog and acid rain and contribute to respiratory diseases
like asthma. Communities near the refineries where the Keystone XL pipeline
terminates, many of them low-income and communities of color, already live with
dangerously high levels of air pollution. The Keystone XL pipeline would
further exacerbate the heavy burden of pollution and environmental injustices
these communities confront.
One dangerous and high-carbon
byproduct of these refineries is petroleum coke, or petcoke. Although petcoke
is produced inexpensively, it is costly to store and is often dumped into open
pits. Burning petcoke is more carbon-intensive than burning coal, so the United
States Environmental Protection Agency will no longer permit power plants in
the United States to do so. However, plants in China, India, and Latin America
import petcoke as a cheap coal substitute.
Stopping
the pipeline
Tar sands oil is one of the dirtiest
fuels on the Earth. Facilitating the exploitation of the tar sands will delay
investments in clean and safe alternatives to oil, such as better fuel economy
requirements, plug-in electric cars fueled by solar power, and smart growth and
public transportation infrastructure that give Americans choices other than
cars. In order to avoid devastating effects on the climate from a global rise
of 2 degrees Celsius, such as the melting of the Arctic ice, sea level rise,
and more extreme tornados and hurricanes and more floods and heat waves, the
International Energy Association says that up to two-thirds of known fossil
reserves must remain untouched.
- See more at: http://www.foe.org/projects/climate-and-energy/tar-sands/keystone-xl-pipeline#sthash.8qNwoVtX.dpuf


No comments:
Post a Comment