Our lead story has to
be “shall I or shant I” when it comes to President Obama deliberating on
whether he’ll follow through with his long standing threats against Assad. And no I’d never get the name mixed up. I know all the arguments for NOT going
in. Ronald Reagan pulled out of Lebanon
and yet did nothing when Saddam Hussein gassed the Iranians in the ‘eighties,
and then the Kurds. And how many dead
people are there today in Samalia today because we didn’t intervent. Yes, and I know about Darfore in the
Sudan. But the thing is all of these “wrongs”
can’t” be corrected by yet another “wrong” of not intervening in the Syrian
slaughter by Assad. Mario and I were
definitely on the same page this morning because he articulated my views quite
well. People have this tendency to be “traumatized”
by a mistake we made ten years ago when we were “beating the drums for war”. It’s rediculas to compare apples to
pomigranates. We need to look at each
problem we face, and psychologists will even tell you this - - you see it as “here
is the problem and here are the circumstances, and I need to know what I need
to do to solve the problem. How do I get
the tools to solve this problem that I have?”
The idea of “what about that guy over there?” or the endless roster of “If
only’s” will do nothing twords solving your present delema. I have bored my blog readers endlessly as
they read with bleary eyes the long laundry list of reasons why Syria is a
completely different situation from either Iraq or Afghanistan. John Kerrey yesterday brought the matter to
national attention- - in case some of you were sleeping. This Seran gas slaughter is not a “false flag
operation” or whatever else they’re calling it.
The battle ships are all in position now to fire their missiles. Joe Byden is now making the pitch for an air
strike. We knock out the fortresses and
crater the air fields- - and hopefully even get Assad himself. We know how this President loves to take out
suspects with Drones. How here is an
opportunity for his crowning glory.
People like Nicole Sandler say “What’s the big deal” and yet chemical
weapons such as these have been taboo in war for nearly a hundred years, and
neither Stalin nor Hitler used these weapons in a theater of war. The Dow Jones Industrial fell 176
points. Not to brag or anything but I
have been way out in front of the learning curve with my comentery on
Syria. Just like I was way out front on
the learning curve on the “Days” plot.
It’s gratifying to see that Gabrial, one of the characters on the show-
- is voicing sentaments now that I spelled out months ago. Sometimes your internet speed is really good-
- and you look at the podcast and it’s two-thirds buffer and only one third
elapsed play time. That’s getting way
out ahead of the game.
This latest news with George Zimmerman is just the sort of bizzare extreme of credulity we expect from him. We hear he's touring the gun factory and publicizing the gun model he killed Trayvon Martin with. This man truely has no shame. But now we hear the State of Florida has to reemburse Zimmerman for all the expences he put out for his defense. This raises some interesting questions. Since Blacks don't win nearly as often, we can conclude that few Blacks profit from this law because they are in prison. And it also seems to reward the richest people and the biggest spenders. George Zimmerman is thus reembursed for that totally ficticious 3 D display of "The Crime" as Zimmerman wants to imagine it. This bit of theater was barred from the trial as not constituting 'evidence" but it was allowed in the sumation- - where it was sure to have Maximum Impact on the Jury. It's like the little girl who was playing on the monkey bars in a dress and her mother said "Somebody might have seen your underwear". And the little girl says, "That's OK because I wasn't wearing any". So George Zimmerman not only is reembursed expenses for shipping witnesses in that a Black defendant might not be able to afford, but Zimmerman gets the money paid back in full. But another more glaring ethical problem exists the news media hasn't even touched. We know his wife lied about how much money they raised for his defense. That's right. Zimmerman just needed to hold out his tin cup and there would be a flood of biggots out there ready to assist. So will Zimmerman have to pay all these people back the money they thought they gave because Zimmerman needed it? When in fact he never needed it at all because he knew the more he spent the more he'd be reimbursed by the state of Florida? Whoever came up with this absurd law doesn't have the intelligence or logic of a pencil neck Geek.
This latest news with George Zimmerman is just the sort of bizzare extreme of credulity we expect from him. We hear he's touring the gun factory and publicizing the gun model he killed Trayvon Martin with. This man truely has no shame. But now we hear the State of Florida has to reemburse Zimmerman for all the expences he put out for his defense. This raises some interesting questions. Since Blacks don't win nearly as often, we can conclude that few Blacks profit from this law because they are in prison. And it also seems to reward the richest people and the biggest spenders. George Zimmerman is thus reembursed for that totally ficticious 3 D display of "The Crime" as Zimmerman wants to imagine it. This bit of theater was barred from the trial as not constituting 'evidence" but it was allowed in the sumation- - where it was sure to have Maximum Impact on the Jury. It's like the little girl who was playing on the monkey bars in a dress and her mother said "Somebody might have seen your underwear". And the little girl says, "That's OK because I wasn't wearing any". So George Zimmerman not only is reembursed expenses for shipping witnesses in that a Black defendant might not be able to afford, but Zimmerman gets the money paid back in full. But another more glaring ethical problem exists the news media hasn't even touched. We know his wife lied about how much money they raised for his defense. That's right. Zimmerman just needed to hold out his tin cup and there would be a flood of biggots out there ready to assist. So will Zimmerman have to pay all these people back the money they thought they gave because Zimmerman needed it? When in fact he never needed it at all because he knew the more he spent the more he'd be reimbursed by the state of Florida? Whoever came up with this absurd law doesn't have the intelligence or logic of a pencil neck Geek.
We have the story of
Robby Riggs throwing the historic “battle of the sexes” match in tennis- and
event that was hyped like a historic event- - that I personally remember. Bobby Riggs first had a match with Margerete
Court “two months earlier” as Mario remembers it, and that jives with my memory
of it. Mario says “that was kind of like
the pre event”. Bobby Riggs did not win
a single set, and afterwards - - Billy Jean King refused to have a rematch with
him “even though it was in the contract they signed”. The new story now is that Bobby Riggs was
deep in debt to the Mafia and he worked out this deal with the Mafia to pay it
back, where the Mafia would bet against Riggs in the match, if he would throw
the match and “make it look like she was really overwhelming him”. He was fifty-six; she was thirty. But if you ask me I don’t believe a word of
it. If anything of this sort had
happened- - there would have been all sorts of press stories about it at the
time. There were none. Nobody questioned the victory. Both the Federation and the Regelus V
Romulans- - think the very idea is an absurdity. As a man you might think I would welcome this
news. But I’m not that petty. Obviously this victory boosted the status of
women tennis player with such stars as Chris Everett.
Jerry Brown announced
today that he would NOT release a single prisoner, as mandated to do by the US
Courts. But supposedly Jerry Brown had “another
plan he’s implementing to relieve overcrowding”. Apparently the state is going to “lease out
cells in Federal Prisons” by way of compromise.
I’m inclined to support Brown on this one. After all this is the US, in fact it’s
California. How bad can conditions
be? My philosophy I would like to see
the numbers declines because crime convictions are truly down- - and not
because I have a legal gun to my head, which means John Q Public, knowing how
they are, will become apprehensive.
This is after dinner
and David Cruise was on a topic I’d like to expand on at length. I actually share one trait with conservatives
in that I, too get annoyed with certain segments of people who live their whole
lives with this “sense of entitlement”.
But the topper of the topper was the news that lobbyists actually are
entitled to pensions from the people they work constantly on to corrupt. Lobbyists not only get pensions in twenty
states including California, but they also have been granted health care
benefits. Keep in mind that normally a
lobbyists job is to BRIBE government officials with money and perks, and not
Receive them. It makes absolutely no
sense. Other examples come to mind. As you know in soap land I’m not only bugged
by the fact that the two biggest stars are gay “characters” who flaunt it in
public, but also this growing sense of ‘entitlement” that pervades their very
souls. Rush Limbaugh once talked about
people placing bottles of Sparklettes water out in the Arizona desert for all
the illegal aliens crowing the border getting into this country. You heard the story about this owner of a
mansion who was going to have all the rose bushes from his yard removed because
his grandkids might get pricked by the thorns.
Next thing you know- - they’ll be giving out miniature sombreros to all
the red ants in your yard, so that the ants don’t get sunburned. One of the most annoying people was the
teenage deaf girl in that movie ‘Children of a lesser God”. How any sane person could tolerate more
than about ten minutes of her “attitude” I don’t know. Then you have J W Serrell around here. He was yelling at someone today for bumping
his chair. He sticks so far out into
that path that often you have to be an acrobat to get around him. And is brushing against his wheels the same
thing? Yet wheel chair people love to
run you over with those same wheels and think nothing of it. That’s what I mean by entitlement. At times even I get a little edgy at these
Arab terrorists who demand every last “nicety” of our legal system and hire
slick attorneys to insure that they receive them. Yet if you were to be arrested in their home
country for a much lesser offense - - you’d be rotting in some prison somewhere
without air conditioning or maybe even food, and if you’re lucky in one week
they’ll let you make a phone call. And then they have this issue proposed on an
old TV show called “The Advocates”, which was “Resolved: Union strikers should be allowed to receive
government unemployment checks”. Oh no
they don’t. Because they can go back to
work any time they want- - and are an insult to the “Truly needy” as Reagan
used to call them- - who had pounded the pavement for weeks looking for a job. Partially disabled older people have to keep
on working after age 65 now.
This whole "Ben and Jerry's" story about printing things on our money that weren't put there by the government, seems to me to be a really iffy notion. Ben of Ben and Jerry's has this "stamp" program where you can chose from one of four stamps to stamp messages right on your money, that supposedly won't wash off or land you in prison for defacing the currency. Like I say it seems really iffy. The most popular choice if "This tender is not legal for buying elections". Others are "money is not speech" and "Get the money out of politics" and "Corporations are not people, my friend". I don't know. The print would have to be so tiny to fit on the meager blank spaces on US bills the print would be too tiny to read- - especially is it's done in hand script- - without really good reading glasses. But just think of all the people that would see your message!
And now we have one of
those concluding paragraphs where we get into “Lively Libations” or
whatever. As you know they have a “kill
switch” they can use in new I Phones you can activate if someone else steals
your I phone so they can’t use it. But
Apple is working in a finger print device, they hope to have perfected for the
October release. But knowing how Apple
was under Steve Jobs, they often hype more than they can deliver. Of course the copy protection in the original
generation of DVD’s - - was hacked within a few short months by a high school
student, who will be turning thirty soon now.
I wanted to talk a little more about Romulan cloaking. The term for cloaked objects being solid to
each other is in fact a familiar one “congruency” or sometimes “co congruency”. The term “physiognomy” is used, and I see
that’s an actual word. Holy
Mackerel. That is it’s matter with the
same incryption altorithm in use. We
said two years ago that there were Romulan cloaking devices available for sale
in the Federation, and the instructions are in Federation print. This is sort of a squarish style of letter- -
not exactly like Korean- - maybe a few diagonal jags thrown in. As you know Lanian script looks very much
like Iranian. And Reigelian script to me
resembles the small letter Greek lettering.
And you know about the all caps Sirius letters- almost identical to
English. I was told two years ago that -
- “It can’t be established as a fact that the Romulan cloaking method has never
been reverse engineered”. But if it has
been- someone is keeping it “unofficial”.

No comments:
Post a Comment