Pope Francis Colaborated with Argintine Military Junta

There is no god- and Sigmond Freud Is His Prophet

-sage saying of the day

 The Guardian, Sunday 17 March 2013
Pope Francis has delivered his first Sunday prayer to a cheering, laughing crowd of about 300,000 people in St Peter's Square, amid hopes that his down-to-earth style will usher in a change in the Vatican.
But while many in Rome were looking forward, accusers in his native Argentina continued to raise awkward questions about the past and reproduced a document suggesting the Jesuit may have betrayed two of his priests to the murderous military dictatorship in the 1970s.  The sharply different perspectives have dogged the early days of the new leader of the Catholic church, who will be officially installed at an inaugural mass on Tuesday.  His capacity to rouse affection and optimism were in evidence as he mixed cheery greetings with humour and anecdotes at his inaugural Angelus.  Speaking in Italian rather than Latin, he joked with the crowd and ended by saying: "Have a good Sunday and a good lunch!" Pilgrims, many from Latin America, roared their approval. ...   However, his critics in Argentina were unwilling to move on so quickly. The pope continues to be haunted by allegations dating back to the dictatorship era, when the Catholic church colluded with the generals to quell what they saw as a Marxist threat.  The Argentinian newspaper Pagina 12 republished old documents on Sunday that suggest Jorge Bergoglio, as the pope was known until last week, was in contact with the military authorities about the insubordination of two of his priests and rumours that they had contact with leftwing guerrilla groups.  Father Orlando Yorio and Father Francisco Jalics were tortured and kept in a concentration camp for nearly six months in 1976, after they refused Bergoglio's order to leave the slum where they were working. In that era, any priest who focused on the poor districts was under suspicion of collaborating with Marxist groups.  A foreign ministry memo from 1979 seems to suggest Bergoglio had passed on suspicions to the authorities, and connived behind the backs of the priests.

Remember with Christianity - People are Expendable; Theology is Not

Marcus Arelius 2005

Dr. Levy and Christianity are alike in that they both commit the same mental error of saying that "One's success and happiness is contingent on one's ability to Deny the Real Problem and Pretend that they don't exist and everything is Fine"

Marcus Arelius, Yesterday

I got up at ten after six.  CBS morning had a thing on the value of having a circle of friends kind of as a support network and “safety net”.  G I R L S really is an acronym for “gee, I really love shopping”.  After this they talked about ear tags on steers.  Whatever happened to the implant chip thing they use to ID pets now?  Why won’t that work?  But the Texas ranchers take pride in their specific brand symbols that often go back generations- - and there were a bunch of them on a plaque of wood, which are still useful for law enforcement to track down thefts.  We had oatmeal again and I had sugar in my pocket for that.  Thankfully it was much thicker today.  However the rest of the breakfast scene was like a bad movie with the same unhappy plotline outcome that runs over and over.  They now have this cart with the butter and jelly and sugar but people from the other side kept running to the cart to get more jelly and wouldn’t you know it?  They were out of jelly by our side.  The coffee was weak, and cold, and the cup not filled that high, and they looked like they were running out of that, too.  Not one food item began first on our side this day.  We finally got our fried egg and toast.  I wasn’t able to watch the start of Meet the Press.  These political parties gave their political speeches much like Ryan and Van Holland did on the internet yesterday, making the same points.  Some of these network roundtables try excessively hard to give republicans the moral equals of democrats.  There were Catholic priests who spoke and I listened to their words, patiently.  I’m trying hard to suspend judgement.

This is Sunday St Patrick’s day and I am wearing that green striped shirt that’s getting a little ragged around the edges.  It’s still pretty cool outside even mid day.  The LA Clippers are leading the NY Nicks 41 to 37 with just a minute to play in the second quarter, already.  We had chili for lunch and it’s been consistently good for a long time now.  We also had corn bread, beets, and crackers.  I had seconds on literally all of that.  We had orange slices for desert.  I also got a part of a peanut butter sandwich from Laurie.  I listened to Leo Le Port talking about VPN’s or virtual private network, and how the studio owners now contact your ISP who forwards a letter to you saying you have one “strike” against you for copyright infringement from using bit torrent.  Also You Tube will often take videos down now, since they have been bought out- - but if you “game the system” or make some deal for placing ads, you can get around that.  I grew drowsy and dozed off and at the one o clock news went out for s smoke and I had a sneezing attack.

They just announced coffee time.  They began the third quarter with what seems “unusual dispatch” and now have just over three minutes to play- and the Clippers have pulled out way ahead 65 to 50 for the Knicks.  I left the room at 2:01 after coffee call, and it was 2:07 when Laura rolled the coffee cart out.  Some early birds got corn bread but I didn’t and left after one cup since the line was long behind me.  The birds were in a chirpy mood both in the morning and afternoon sessions.  In the morning I did not wear a jacket.  We got some of that green cake with our coffee and they had plenty of that.  I got a second cup of coffee, too.  If I am to get in a posting today it will most likely be after dinner.  My fear is that Dr. Levy won’t be logical enough when he says “Ill include a writing of yours in the March news” for it to be the one thing I have actually sent him in the past six months, that’s a good one.  His discernment for what’s good and what isn’t that good- - seems to be non existant.  Again an annoying point with Dr. Levy is that he likes mental patients to write “his idea of what I mental patient ought to be capable of” rather than how the actual Patient (if we must call him that) chooses to actually express himself and his truths.  And complements he gives are worthless- - - because his overall attitude is so patronizing to begin with.  They’ll be happy to give you a pretend job with pretend complements- - with a pretend Pollyanna attitude that won’t cut the mustard in real life..

I have been thinking on that idea that only our "alter ego" or Super Self- - survives after our death, but we ourselves don’t.  The problem here is that virtually so much of Federation core beliefs are based on engrams- and both Mal Evans and Stu Sutcliffe pointed this notion of mine "Is a really bad idea".  Besides this- - Kurt Cobain came to me with an entirely different line of argument that was even more convincing, and which I cannot ignore.  The whole idea of consciousness after death being limited to “What others thought of you” diminishes the whole importance of Self, and in a sence the whole “Meaning’ for it all.  More specifically- - the dead have lives NOW - - after death.  They still are people with interests and goals and preferences.  If you come to know someone as a friend- - even if they should become a rock star- - you still have the inside track on knowing what they truly are like, and to deny this is a patent insult to both of you and your relationship.

So at this time I’d like to speak more in detail on the exact nature of engrams.  First of all it would be interesting to check out the bizarre engrams the officials of the Church of Scientology have ruling them right now, that they strangely have not dealt with.  Indeed they say “let me take the speck out of my brother’s eye” and yet have a big plank in their own.  (Selah)  How can they look at themselves in the mirror each morning?  And what about Jesus Christ?  What notion or engram did he pick up that told him he was both God and infallible?  I would like to have a step by step “walk through” on the exact mechanics of that one.  But it was Mal Evans who broached the idea that engrams can be from the future just as easily as they can be from the Past.  In other words - - these engrams are not subject to the normal forces of time but as it were exist in time but apart from it.  We know that these engrams are a physical manifestation of a psychological “notion” or “injunction” or “belief”.  As beliefs, or feelings- - whether they are true or false in this instance, is completely immaterial.  This is not to say Truth and Falsity are not important but to say that the physical “manifestation” of engrams between the two are alike.  It’s like saying an Albert Sweitzer and a Ted Bundy are not born differently - - in terms of the process- - but once they come out- - it’s clear their souls are very different.  The way Mal Evans put it to me yesterday is “Why should any part of my being judged as a person, be contingent on dignifying the false and irrational belief of Another?”  But at the same time keep in mind that since engrams come from the future as well as the past you can not “make them into something they are not- - or wish them away or pray they won’t come or haven’t arrived, merely because you Will it, simply because you just don’t have that kind of power.  Because the future was all pretty much baked into the cake by the nature of your own Soul”.   However Bones came to me today again and did say “You know- - I too believe that your judged not on what you think or feel or “were intending to do” but rather on what you DO.  Neither are you judged on what you - - Accomplish.  This is the opposite extreme some pastors like Chuck Smith would like to brag about so proudly.  Your karma is not based either on what pops into your mind and you reject- or not certainly like this sitcom where so often you hear the convenient line “You know- - I was actually intending to do something really NICE for you - - but Now you have gone and ruined it all on account of what you just did”.  If you hear this line spouted to you by some passive aggressive loved one once too often it could be grating on your nerves.  Karma is based on what you DO.  And here Stewart is in agreement with me that others should be perhaps entitled to “throw in their two cents” on seeing you perform either consistently good acts or bad acts.  This is for the simple reason that others are impacted by your acts.  If I say “I owe my philosophy of life to Randy Rhodes and Thom Hartman” one might suppose I could this is a bragging point for why I came out so smart.  But in reality it’s not material to MY justification- - but it will certainly accrew to the karmas of Randy Rhodes and Thom Hartman.  But there is one final point I would like to conclude with right here.  Some and perhaps Dr. Levy and certainly a lot of therapists and psychologists will tell you “A situation is bad or good only if you Choose to Believe that it is either Bad or Good.  And if you change your Belief about the encounter (or incident or trauma) then- - the Engram formed at this time will be different.  To refute this we need look no further than popular song lyrics.  Cher sings “but I can’t run away from what I Am” and Paul Revere and the Raiders sing “You see, no matter what you do, you’ll never run away from you”.  This has always been a guiding principle of mine.   Do you take people to be such fools that if you tell them “I’m not really screwing you over- - it’s all in your mind” they aren’t smart enough to know the difference- - ie as to what’s either a Good thing form them in their lives or a Bad thing?  Even the tea party, as self centered as they are, are able to discern a Good thing happening for them, and a Bad thing.  When the tea party people were walking all over President Obama in those first two years I KNEW it was a bad thing.  Tom Hartman’s assertions of “The President is playing chess and the others are playing checkers” is really a pretty silly line, if you’re competing in a checkers championship.  “Knowing the rules of the game” is one of the fundamental principles of interaction in this world.  People who seen to “not get it’ and haven’t a clue as to what “the rules” are- we say have Aspurgers syndrome or something.  You see they too play their own private little “games” in their own mind.  Perhaps the President hears voices in his head in his own mind- - but that game and those rules will do him no good.  Even a lazy person is often capable of being “shamed” into seeing what an unproductive loser he is.  And for Dr. Levy to say to mental patients “Don’t compare yourselves to others” is kind of like saying “I came here to look at freaky people so go on - - Do something freaky for me”, kind of like that kid who is waving his head and hands and getting dizzy “Hold on, I’m watching this!”