The Mc Laughlin group featured the China deal that the President was working on in China. One questions why the President even went on a trip with all the negotiating he should be at least attempting with Mc Conell and Boehner according to Chris Matthews. Matthews claims the President should have broken the immigration agreement down feature by feature and negotiated all of the terms in a face to face meeting. This would make it harder for Boehner to claim that “He doesn’t really want the deal” when he claims that he does. But this deal with China is bad on so many levels. Apparently nothing will be done about the massive cyber theft that is going on with China, ripping off our programs. And we are all sick of NAFTA, CAFTA, and SHAFTA, southern half of Asia free trade agreement. Apparently- - judging from the past with Korea, we make all the hard concession and the other side gives a lick and a promise and continues to keep our goods out. Pat Buchannon was the only one of the group with his head screwed on right. He says “Of course China is nationalist, as we and Britain used to be”. He pointed out all the ways that China will profit from the deal. And in terms of air pollution- - apparently China conceded nothing despite the fact that marathon runners have to wear gas masks when they run to avoid the fumes. In fact the Chinese government ordered a massive shutdown of factories and the cutting off of heat to people’s homes, just so the skies would be blue when the President showed up. If I were the president I would have said “I am not impressed one bit by this”. But our side has all these constrictions of the economy we have to live up to. With all the other diplomatic fopahs like the Nicotine gum - - this visit did nothing to increase President Obama’s stature and the whole trip had negative value. Chris Matthews continues to insist that the XP Canadian pipeline is destined to come about and it’s only a matter of when and not if it will be built. I strongly disagree considering the pipeline is still tied up in court cases in Nebraska. Matthews has this closet “republican” streak remaining in him.
I
watched Meet the Press. There was
another ISIS beheading. Today I was informed
by my friends from the “other side” that it’s their belief that ISIS might be
just a shadow “front organization” secretly doing United States bidding. They are, shall we say, just a little obvious
and propagandistic in prompting the American People to keep the Mideast war
going – whatever the form. Before we
ever heard of ISIS (way back earlier this year) there was one blog entry I read
that stipulated that “The United States will manufacture an incident in the Mideast
to start another war. This new guy on
NBC asks better guestions than David Gregory ever did as far as nailing certain
key issues to the wall. Janet Nepolatano
who is now the chandelor of the California University system was on at
nine. She made a good case for raising
both the salaries of the reigents but also of the tuition Students pay. Apparently there was some question about
lowering academic standards for out of state students because they provide more
revenue with higher out of state tuitions.
Janet denied this was going on, and I’m inclined to believe her and to
distrust anything Jerry Brown says at this point. Jerry Brown has turned into such a money
skinflint I don’t know what to think about him anymore. I did not post on Saturday and so the anti
war thing on my blog has been the lead posting since Friday. One motive in pirating someone elses’ posting
is to get my own blogger reader numbers up, and then presumably after I have
bagged the readers’ attention, they’ll go on to read my own ideas.
There are a lot of
myths and facts concerning the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, which USA
Today outlines quite well. Yet there are
countless myths about the promises the President made that don’t appear in his
acceptance speech. First of all the speech
was shorter than normal. It was 45
minutes but that includes marathon applause and music at the beginning and the
president primping - - before he goes on to remind people of his humility. There were endless adulations to family
members and the Clintons and Joe Byden - - and then he launches into an endless
series of personal examples of people who got fired from their job or students
in trouble or talks more about his own past.
A list of the promises NOT made in this speech is downright staggering. At no time does he say “We must end the Iraq
War now”. At no time does he propose ANY
timetable for ending that war. At no
times does he discuss the torturing or our prisoners of war or the closing of
Guantanamo Bay. At no time does he talk
about personal rights to privacy being violated by the government, or secrecy
or war crimes committed by the Bush administration. At no time does the President discuss global
warming or the measures that have to be taken.
At no time does he propose an end to fossile fuel addiction. On the contrary the Presidential nominee
talks about “clean coal” and increased drilling for natural gas, alluding to
fracking, no doubt. At no time does he
say we shouldn’t have more oil refineries or new massive oil pipelines to those
refineries. At no time does he criticize
ANY supreme court decision or talk about a woman’s rights being scaled back in
the case of abortion. At no time does he
mention abortion doctors who were murdered.
At no time does the President pledge to either raise the taxes on the
rich, or to scale back the deficit. He
never criticizes the Bush Administration for medicare part D not paid for or
funding two wars “off the books”. At no
time does he say these international trade agreements such as NAFTA or CAFTA
are bad for American jobs or American business. He certainly never talks about working
vigerously to maintain the voting rights of minorities. He never specifies what shovel ready
government public works products he will do.
He offers no specifics of any health care plan at all. At no time does he pledge to insure every
American. At no time does he speak of
either single payer or a “public option” to keep the private insurance
companies honest. He never speaks of the
Dream act- - or any real immigration reform at all. He never talks about ending these massive
subsedies to big energy and big agri business.
He never comes out against genetically modified organisms. He never speaks of patent reform in drug laws
or going after drug company profits. So
what DOES the president talk about? He
speaks of the cynicism of Washington and restoring trust. He spends a whole lot of time attacking his
yet to be opponent nominee John Mc Cain.
He spends a lot of time talking about the “Spirit of America”. Look how long it took me to give a bare
bones outline of all the things the President never promised in that Convention
Speech.
Chris Matthews criticized President Obama for
developing a spine- - perhaps. He says
he’s going to take action in immigration, but of course- - hasn’t done that
yet. So has anything really changed? Is this yet something else the Republicans
are going to talk or bully him out of doing?
In like manner the President delivered a speech indicating a sympathy
tword not signing the XL Canadian pipeline bill. But the President never said that he either
would or wouldn’t sign the thing. So
once again we’re in the dark. The issues
where the President has taken a clear “moral” stance are few and far between
and tend to center on women’s rights and gay rights. On no other issues does the President have
any firm principles at all. I still view events prior to 2008 as "The good old days" because I associate such a drop in my own "outlook" since then, and this roughly corresponds to the period when Dad has been dead. Last
night I did ruminate about those “Dad” references I read from 2007 in Google
Desktop. Perhaps Dad was sicker than I
was willing to admit because there was incident after incident or a diverse
nature indicating all was not well. It
was “Not something we would all laugh about a year from now after the crisis
passed” any more than this crisis with the tea party controlling virtually all
aspects of the national government now is something that will “pass” any time
soon.
I
had Leo Le Port on - - and he says that some slow DSL is only one and a half
million BPS. Mine is two and a half
MBPS. Yesterday Leo reminded us that
cable is more prone to slow downs than is DSL because the more people using the
pipeline the more congested it is. Last
night on the Mc Laughlin group- - everybody seemed to be weighing in AGAINST
net neutrality, and I don’t remember Eleanor Clift saying otherwise. Of course if you have to pay to get “Proper
service” it’s kind of like a roadside shakedown like the cops or the mafia in
the old days in the big city. My point
is that even though it isn’t a problem now, that the point of declaring the
internet to be a common carrier is to PREVENT stuff from happening of an
“untword nature”. I thought we were all
on the same team as our President here, but apparently not. You know if the people eighty years ago were
as lacking in foresight as we are today- - America would be a lot less nicer
place to live in today.
I wanted to just a little make reference to Bill
Clinton’s daytime TV program interview of yesterday. Clinton says that apart from age- - all of
the differences we see in people in terms of their intelligence or temperament
or hair color or thickness, or body build, or eye shape or color or skin color
or body build- - all of this is a half of one percent of Human DNA. With such a tiny percent of DNA changing
making such physical alterations- - such as tigers evolving into house cats or
wolves evolving into Collies or what have you - - it is easy to see that
basically what unites the human race is far more pervaisive, the 99.5% as opposed
to the traits that divide us. We won’t
even speak of the vast differences that are due to strictly geography, or the
linquistics and culture of a locality. We
spoke of creation in our last posting.
The Bible says “We are all of one blood”. There is that 99.5% that unite us, that
declare us to be created in the image of God.
Those are all the traits that HAVEN’T changed in a million years or so. But just to set some of your minds at ease- - it's more a commmonolity of the Design, rather than the Designer that I'm talking about. I'm talking about carbon based life forms that for the most part consume water and have at least molicules recognizable as DNA even if they are vastly different from ours. It's this comonality of design and "nature" which unites us as a people.

No comments:
Post a Comment