LIBYAN REBELS TAKE COMMAND OF QADAFI COMPOUND

The rebels have now taken command of the Qadafi compound in Tripoli. It would seem that freedom is at hand. Qadafi is in hiding and three of his sons have been put to death in the past few days. It seems only a matter of time before Qadafi is either killed himself, or brought to trial. Don’t expect the conservatives to be happy about that. On one hand it will rob them of “something to complain about” and on the other they can employ the Pat Buchannon argument that Qadafi was a “trusted ally” and us “trusted allies” have to stay together. Of course those on the right assume that behind every revolution lurks Al Qaeda out to further their world domination aims. The tea party says so many things on zero evidence, like the idea that is the Fed Chairman stimulates the money supply interest rates will explode. We know that the tea party lives pretty much in their own world. Stephanie Miller repeated many of the same stories she told yesterday about Michelle Bachman. One could make the argument she hangs out with more potential “terrorists” than the President ever did in his youth. I don’t recall the Rev. Jeremiah Wright making the overt advocations of violence that Sarah Palin has made, for instance. Some say that Rick Perry is not Presidential timber because “he’s an egomanic who relies on his own feelings too much”. People have said that about Mark Bove, too. I guess the question is whether they are right, and to quote the song “Rick Perry hasn’t been right yet”. I would trust Dr. Carlie Manning from Days of our Lives, who is drug re-hab now- - - with her hand on the nuclear button than I would trust either Chuck Smith - - or Governor Rick Perry. What was a mere accusation against Barry Goldwater is a literal truth about Rick Perry, knowing his mind set. So hypothetically if Syria falls now and Assad goes away, that will mean a swath of liberated Mideast countries ringing the Medeteranian. It sounds good, anyhow. But the tea party needs an enemy and if they can’t find one abroad, they will turn domestic and call the President of the United States the most dreaded enemy we have to face today. Of course when Assad took power people had hopes that ht would be more “liberal” than his father had been, since he was Western educated and all and is one of these swave, debonair types like Elvis Di Mira. He’s not your typical mad cartoon editorial drawing. Since the press world wide has not been kind to Islam in general, I hardly see how they can proselytize anybody with such “bad press” that would most certainly give any prospect convert second thoughts.

There was a 5.9 earthquake in northeast Virginia and was felt all over Washington DC and several other states. They shut down two nuclear Virginia reactors just as a safety precaution. Trains were delayed to inspect the tracks. Pinicles fell off the National Cathedral. Some are now saying that Washington DC wither was or is "one hundred years overdue for an earthquake". The quake was felt in Williamsport PA during a little league game, don't ask me how- - and as far south as Charleston, South Carolina. It’s too bad it really wasn’t the rapture- or maybe Rick Perry and Michelle Bachman would be gone now. Some say that the earthquake was caused by “fracking” or that practice of injecting water into unstable ground to increase the natural gas pressure. Apparently in the Bay Area they have mercury pollution in the estuaries that has been there for ninety years. It was at that time they banned the practice of hydro-mining in the Sierra Nevada where they employed mercury apparently to leech out various minerals. They are still blowing off mountain tops in West Virginia. Some say that the E P A is just some “conspiracy” to hobble industry instituted by the communists. That’s apparently that that one guy learned at the meeting he attended of the American Communist Party in 1992. I don’t know why on earth he would believe that organization, which supposedly he doesn’t trust.

Mal Evans came to me during that Lawerence of Arabia thing I was watching, and he said “He’s not one of ours, you know. We were on the side of the Turks”. There was talk after this about whoever “enabled the Saudis” to spawn all these terrorist groups and gauge us out of our money- - wouldn’t be that good. Mal said, “You know, if you were referring to us in the remark about Heaven on that page, you’re absolutely right, of course. Most Americans would be regarded as aliens in our culture. They would soon find we have little tolerance for their brand of reactionary thinking. We of course are more - - - proactive in our economic planning than you are, as to energy and resource allocation, and employment allocation”. I asked, not expecting an answer whether they’d ever had any tea party movements in the Federation. He said “Nothing of that sort would ever happen here. Why would it? It would be totally illogical”. I said “logical?” and he said “in general American’s high level of illogic would not be tolerated here, and they would have to learn quickly”. I brought up the subject of astral projections of the soul into a different body and ask “How do they do it? How do they transform themselves so instantaneously?” He said to me “Have you ever been in a situation where the tone of the conversation caught you totally unawares and off-guard”. I said “As a matter of fact, I have”. He said “Well that sort of thing wouldn’t happen because you’d have been enculturated by short prior exposures. And also there that sense memory thing that would kick in”. I didn’t ask him to define “sense memory”. I think I know what that is. I said “What about that guy a while back who had died that asked all the questions?” He said, “That case was a little unusual. But different people have different things in their dharma and in his case it happened that he had to be inculturated really quickly’. I asked, “How come most people don’t have that problem?” Mal said, “Well actually, most dead people are just not that aware of what they don’t know. This guy was”. I said “OK”.

"MORE POPULAR THAN GOD!"

Tell the truth. Those of you who saw the promo, how many of you were hoping I'd be talking on the Universe and the speed of light, raise your hands. Gosh- - well those of you who raised your hands I salute you, because that's just what we're going to talk about today. Well move over, Beatles. Einstein has taken your place. They say 94% of Americans believe in God. But when it comes to the special theory of relativity- - this theory had one hundred percent adherants, with no doubters. I Googled it for myself. There were only two- - - two entries under the category of doubters of the Theory and both of those sites was nonesensical. One was a Star Trek trivia site I didn't attempt to follow. I was going to title this paragraph "Is Everybody A Bunch Of Idiots?" Aren't there a few scientists out there with a few brain cells that still work. I plan to give you four reasons why Einstein's theory us unworkable in graffic terms that could be shown on a five minute TV info-mercial. Reason one. Black Holes. Einstein says that they not only don't exist cut CAN'T exist, no way no how. The math just won't allow for it. But according to most scientists today black holes DO exist. Reason number two. Ether. Einstein says Ether does not exist. However scientists also believe in the "soap bubble" view of the expanding Universe through time. This rests on what you might call the essential "static ether theory" that for the most part doesn't move. Except that it stretches. And there is the rub. Follow this. The Universe has spent Twelve Billion years- - - expanding. Just imagine how big it is now. What with all that ether stretching don't you think that a Universe at least thirty billion lightyears in diameter- - the stretching involved would exceed the speed of light. They used to give us "reports" on the farthest distances seen through telescopes and some were saying things were receding at one third the speed of light. Then it was "approaching the speed of light". Finally they said (at last report) "It doesn't matter that stars recede at greater than the speed of light because the "space" itself is also moving. Einstein didn't believe in Ether. But at Astronomy Cafe they say "space has substance". All sorts of substance. Here comes reason three. You've heard about all the LSD - Alice in Wonderland drug induced shrinkage and expansion of time and space and mass and energy. Einstein allows for all of that. The problem is that every BIT of it- - is explainable through ordenary Newtonian physics given the caviat that light itself is hindred and limited in its speed- - but nothing else is. Nothing changes shape and time doesn't "warp" with or without a warp drive. Here is a simple illustration. Picture two space ships going away from each other each going 1/3 the speed of light the other way. Now, rewind the film a little till before the two ships passed each other by and they were still approaching each other. Now as you measure relative time and space and mass and energy of the two ships- each examining the other- - -and also assume that both ships are neither accelerating nor decelerating but traveling at a steady speed- - - can you honestly sit there and tell me that each ship shrinks and expands or whatever in mass and shape- - merely by passing another ship? That's nonesense. Obviously nothing physically is happening to either ship either before or after passing each other. Now here is Reason Four. In Einstein's thinking there is the notion of the movable "stationary point". This is a valid thing to keep in mind. For instance, some will ask "Where is the center point of the expanding Universe?" The answer can ONLY be answered AFTER you have where and what "stationary" is. Vector geometry can play all sorts of optical tricks on the eyes. For instance- - I could speak a hypothetical planet with a skewed gravitional field. That is- - one side of the planet has a lot MORE gravity than the other, such that a sattelite of eliptical orbit would travel at Constant speed and a sattelite with a round orbit would travel at variable speed. However if we first don't define "stationary" - - we have that whole light and optics distortion illusion "pandoras box" to deal with. It could be (I said Could) that a planet may have a perfectly circular gravitational field with respect to itself, but the field is SEEN as skewed, by other moving on-lookers. (Selah) Now - come back. Einstein not only believes in a "moving zero" but also a "universal zero" principle. That is, the theory teaches that all of the factors of the special relitivity equation kick in only with factors Higher than one, and never Lower. This makes Every Person the SLOWEST person in the universe, and there can NEVER be anyone slower. To that's me, that's you, that's the guy on a flight to New York City, and it's the astronauts aboard the International space station. As Dylan put it once, "Not all people can be right all of the time". The bottom line of all this becomes apparent when you look at some recriprical qualities of the "addition of volocities equation". Classic physics deals in negative force vectors or "opposits" force vectors. It has to. Hence for Einstein's theory to be valid what is true with addition has to be true with subtraction, or negative numbers. You should see "so the proponets will tell you" a mirror imaging of the number readings in negative numbers for the theory to be valid. But you don't. I've run the numbers and the formula falls flat on its face. This is nothing less than conclusive proof that the theory is bogus. This concludes my argument on that. I have one more point to make. I was talking about circular gravitational fields a few moments ago. But in my "motor boat" analogy- - the gravitational field at a certain point traveling through a medium- - such as water - OR ether- would begin to turn eliptical in nature. Carried even further- - at some point- - at a precise point, actually- - you would leave your own gravitational field and do that coveted thing of "sshedding your own mass". This is based on the "what you see is what you get" or the Flip Wilson theory of gravity propagation that scientists believe in. Einstein never had to answer the question of "What happens when you reach the limits of space". But it's a question the rest of us struggle with.

"Now let me get this straight"

"Google searches how many sites in a fraction of a second?"

"Several hundred thousand, you say."

"All of the people can't be Right all of the time, huh?"

"Gosh- - I'm going to have to study on that one!"